User talk:Thedemonapostle - Revision history

imported>ABCoLD: /* Content Guidelines */

2016-04-23T00:37:20Z

Content Guidelines

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 22 April 2016
Line 177:		Line 177:

	I ask as you mentioned that you pulled some information for the Defel page from Wookieepedia, and I'm wondering where the lines are as it sometimes seems blurry.--[[User:ABCoLD\|ABCoLD]] ([[User talk:ABCoLD\|talk]]) 16:30, 21 April 2016 (CDT)		I ask as you mentioned that you pulled some information for the Defel page from Wookieepedia, and I'm wondering where the lines are as it sometimes seems blurry.--[[User:ABCoLD\|ABCoLD]] ([[User talk:ABCoLD\|talk]]) 16:30, 21 April 2016 (CDT)
			:Hey, if you're not watching my talk page I just responded there using a : thing, so we're not doing talk page tag. :) --[[User:ABCoLD\|ABCoLD]] ([[User talk:ABCoLD\|talk]]) 19:37, 22 April 2016 (CDT)

imported>ABCoLD: /* Content Guidelines */ new section

2016-04-21T21:30:07Z

Content Guidelines: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 21 April 2016
Line 171:		Line 171:

	Thanks, hope to hear from you soon! --[[User:ABCoLD\|ABCoLD]] ([[User talk:ABCoLD\|talk]]) 20:36, 20 April 2016 (CDT)		Thanks, hope to hear from you soon! --[[User:ABCoLD\|ABCoLD]] ([[User talk:ABCoLD\|talk]]) 20:36, 20 April 2016 (CDT)

			== Content Guidelines ==

			What are the guidelines for adding content with new details. For example AFAIK there is no actual description of a Pocket Computer in the game system. There's simply an availability and a price listed. If I were to make a page for the Pocket Computer would it be acceptable to write up a short blurb for a description? (And at what point does description become homebrew game information? Personally I would write something along the lines that a Pocket Computer works somewhat similarly to a modern smart phone. As in it can run simple applications and can allow you to interface with other devices but doesn't provide any bonuses to the attempt.

			I ask as you mentioned that you pulled some information for the Defel page from Wookieepedia, and I'm wondering where the lines are as it sometimes seems blurry.--[[User:ABCoLD\|ABCoLD]] ([[User talk:ABCoLD\|talk]]) 16:30, 21 April 2016 (CDT)

imported>ABCoLD: /* New Character Templates, et al. */ new section

2016-04-21T01:36:35Z

New Character Templates, et al.: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 20 April 2016
Line 161:		Line 161:

	Thanks for looking out for the site, though! I thought nobody had been here since 2013!		Thanks for looking out for the site, though! I thought nobody had been here since 2013!

			== New Character Templates, et al. ==

			Hey, as you seem to be the most active Admin I'll ask you about this. :) I updated the standard template that was being used for character templates to something I feel is a little cleaner. Would you be ok with me updating current templates and adding new ones with this template style? (It's featured on my talk page.)

			Also would it be alright if after the master list on the Character Template page I added additional collapsible lists of for the templates that share a common theme? For example, Rebel Operatives, Smugglers and Scoundrels, Pirates and Privateers, Imperials, New Republic Era, Bounty Hunters, Tapani Sector Campaign, etc. Obviously nearly any template can be used with any campaign, but it might help new/returning GMs to point characters to specific sections for inspiration.

			On the subject of organizing, how do we feel about categories?

			Thanks, hope to hear from you soon! --[[User:ABCoLD\|ABCoLD]] ([[User talk:ABCoLD\|talk]]) 20:36, 20 April 2016 (CDT)

imported>Thekraytdragon at 20:24, 21 May 2015

2015-05-21T20:24:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 21 May 2015
Line 152:		Line 152:

	== Other Edits ==		== Other Edits ==
			Here are my main points:
			*Yes, I have a source for the Katarn Armor edits, I'll add that next.
			*I feel that the comment on the Storm Commando page was necessary, as in the book Galaxy Guide 9: Fragments from the Rim (which is also right in front of me), the entry on Radtrooper armor is right next to the Storm Commando armor entry, while here it is not.
			*I have done quite a bit of research on rail guns, as I wish to build one. During this research I came across the fact that rail guns have no recoil. According to the page, they do. That is why I added the comment, because if that is what the book said, then the book is wrong. So I told Gamemasters to ignore it, unless it served the plot. Makes sense, right?
			*The entire point of designing SBD's was to increase the durability of the Droid infantry. If they have the same amount of armor as a B1, that kinda defeats the purpose, now doesn't it? I know, in The Clone Wars TV show, they are just as weak as the others, but according to everyone else, they are not.
			*In the Rebel Alliance Sourcebook (wow! Also right in front of me!) is the fact that the design of a Star Destroyer allows ALL turbolasers to fire forward, and that nothing can fire backwards.


	~~Yes, I have a source for the Katarn Armor edits, I'll add that next.~~
	I feel that the comment on the Storm Commando page was necessary, as in the book Galaxy Guide 9: Fragments from the Rim (which is also right in front of me), the entry on Radtrooper armor is right next to the Storm Commando armor entry, while here it is not.
	I have done quite ambit of research on rail guns, as I wish to build one. During this research I came across the fact that rail guns have no recoil. According to the page, they do. That is why I added the comment, because if that is what the book said, then the book is wrong. So I told Gamemasters to ignore it, unless it served the plot. Makes sense, right?
	The entire point of designing SBD's was to increase the durability of the Droid infantry. If they have the same amount of armor as a B1, that kinda defeats the purpose, now doesn't it? I know, in The Clone Wars TV show, they are just as weak as the others, but according to everyone else, they are not.
	~~And in the Rebel Alliance Sourcebook (wow! Also right in front of me!) is the fact that the design of a Star Destroyer allows ALL turbolasers to fire forward, and that nothing can fire backwards.~~
	Thanks for looking out for the site, though! I thought nobody had been here since 2013!		Thanks for looking out for the site, though! I thought nobody had been here since 2013!

imported>Thekraytdragon: /* Other Edits */ new section

2015-05-21T20:21:22Z

Other Edits: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 21 May 2015
Line 150:		Line 150:
	Hey man, I know you may have some sources that say otherwise, but I'm right this time. I currently have the		Hey man, I know you may have some sources that say otherwise, but I'm right this time. I currently have the
	best possible source on this info in front of me, the Imperial Sourcebook. And the Imperial Sourcebook says that Super Star Destroyers are eight thousand meters long, have a total of one thousand forty weapons, and carry 144 TIE Fighters. No argument.		best possible source on this info in front of me, the Imperial Sourcebook. And the Imperial Sourcebook says that Super Star Destroyers are eight thousand meters long, have a total of one thousand forty weapons, and carry 144 TIE Fighters. No argument.

			== Other Edits ==

			Yes, I have a source for the Katarn Armor edits, I'll add that next.
			I feel that the comment on the Storm Commando page was necessary, as in the book Galaxy Guide 9: Fragments from the Rim (which is also right in front of me), the entry on Radtrooper armor is right next to the Storm Commando armor entry, while here it is not.
			I have done quite ambit of research on rail guns, as I wish to build one. During this research I came across the fact that rail guns have no recoil. According to the page, they do. That is why I added the comment, because if that is what the book said, then the book is wrong. So I told Gamemasters to ignore it, unless it served the plot. Makes sense, right?
			The entire point of designing SBD's was to increase the durability of the Droid infantry. If they have the same amount of armor as a B1, that kinda defeats the purpose, now doesn't it? I know, in The Clone Wars TV show, they are just as weak as the others, but according to everyone else, they are not.
			And in the Rebel Alliance Sourcebook (wow! Also right in front of me!) is the fact that the design of a Star Destroyer allows ALL turbolasers to fire forward, and that nothing can fire backwards.
			Thanks for looking out for the site, though! I thought nobody had been here since 2013!

imported>Thekraytdragon: /* Executor-class Star Dreadnought */ new section

2015-05-21T19:51:43Z

Executor-class Star Dreadnought: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 21 May 2015
Line 145:		Line 145:

	[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor1138\|talk]]) 22:07, 6 May 2014 (CDT)		[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor1138\|talk]]) 22:07, 6 May 2014 (CDT)

			== Executor-class Star Dreadnought ==

			Hey man, I know you may have some sources that say otherwise, but I'm right this time. I currently have the
			best possible source on this info in front of me, the Imperial Sourcebook. And the Imperial Sourcebook says that Super Star Destroyers are eight thousand meters long, have a total of one thousand forty weapons, and carry 144 TIE Fighters. No argument.

imported>Inquisitor1138: /* Hello there! */ new section

2014-05-07T03:07:45Z

Hello there!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:07, 6 May 2014
Line 139:		Line 139:

	Ain't heard from you in a while. You okay?<br>Anyway, I added [[Colonel Erlick Frodar]] and will post [[Talon Karrde]] next. Also, I'm correcting errors in the stuff cut and paste from the pdf scans, as the scans sometimes mix up letters, or letters with numbers and vice-versa.<br> --[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor1138\|talk]]) 00:51, 29 July 2012 (EDT)		Ain't heard from you in a while. You okay?<br>Anyway, I added [[Colonel Erlick Frodar]] and will post [[Talon Karrde]] next. Also, I'm correcting errors in the stuff cut and paste from the pdf scans, as the scans sometimes mix up letters, or letters with numbers and vice-versa.<br> --[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor1138\|talk]]) 00:51, 29 July 2012 (EDT)

			== Hello there! ==

			I'm back and wondering if you're around.

			[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor1138\|talk]]) 22:07, 6 May 2014 (CDT)

imported>Inquisitor1138: /* Stuff */ new section

2012-07-29T04:51:50Z

Stuff: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 29 July 2012
Line 135:		Line 135:

	Nothing malicious is meant by this. All we ask is that permission is sought for the images and the work. If you e-mail the above address this can hopefully be rectified.		Nothing malicious is meant by this. All we ask is that permission is sought for the images and the work. If you e-mail the above address this can hopefully be rectified.

			== Stuff ==

			Ain't heard from you in a while. You okay?<br>Anyway, I added [[Colonel Erlick Frodar]] and will post [[Talon Karrde]] next. Also, I'm correcting errors in the stuff cut and paste from the pdf scans, as the scans sometimes mix up letters, or letters with numbers and vice-versa.<br> --[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor1138\|talk]]) 00:51, 29 July 2012 (EDT)

imported>Smith87: /* Getting Permission */

2012-03-11T04:15:48Z

Getting Permission

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 11 March 2012
Line 134:		Line 134:
	He has also asked that you could unban him from this site.		He has also asked that you could unban him from this site.

	Nothing malicious is meant by this. All we ask is that permission is sought for the images. If you e-mail the above address this can hopefully be rectified.		Nothing malicious is meant by this. All we ask is that permission is sought for the images and the work. If you e-mail the above address this can hopefully be rectified.

imported>Smith87: /* Getting Permission */ new section

2012-03-11T04:13:10Z

Getting Permission: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 11 March 2012
Line 113:		Line 113:

	--[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] 18:35, 19 August 2011 (EDT)		--[[User:Inquisitor1138\|Inquisitor1138]] 18:35, 19 August 2011 (EDT)

			== Getting Permission ==

			I am here on behalf of my fellow simmer on SGTNG. He has asked me to pass on this message.


			''Hey, about you guys using the BC-303 thru BC-309 you took from the SG:TNG wiki, please email me (or IM me) at AsidMjolnir@yahoo.com''

			He has also asked that you could unban him from this site.

			Nothing malicious is meant by this. All we ask is that permission is sought for the images. If you e-mail the above address this can hopefully be rectified.

	== Getting Permission ==		== Getting Permission ==